How are we going to hold agents liable when they cause real damage? And political superintelligence is proceeding. This and more in this week's System Check!
There is a substantial lack of trasparency and lots of open questions on what really OpenAi has done with the so called rogue model: e.g.: was OpenAI really aware of the risks of performing the test? Had OpenAi taken all necessary steps to ensure a safe test? Was the sandbox robust enough to perform the task or the test was organized like a joke? There are lots of informations that OpenAi should give about what really happened and why. Otherwise we will be left with the strange feeling that we saw another OpenAi soap opera with just the objective to show that OpenAI has developed a model as powerful as Anthropic's Mithos. I also have a final question: why in the world OpenAi created a hacking model instead of an LLM able to find bugs???
There is a substantial lack of trasparency and lots of open questions on what really OpenAi has done with the so called rogue model: e.g.: was OpenAI really aware of the risks of performing the test? Had OpenAi taken all necessary steps to ensure a safe test? Was the sandbox robust enough to perform the task or the test was organized like a joke? There are lots of informations that OpenAi should give about what really happened and why. Otherwise we will be left with the strange feeling that we saw another OpenAi soap opera with just the objective to show that OpenAI has developed a model as powerful as Anthropic's Mithos. I also have a final question: why in the world OpenAi created a hacking model instead of an LLM able to find bugs???