I wonder what would happen if you provided a minority to scapegoat. Right now, the workers have only the manager to blame. Which models would prefer to radicalize right instead of left?
Also, the continual realignment reminds me of businesses already do this with human workers, e.g., family speak. Could have manager AIs that read and edit notes to align with corporate values, monitoring and fixing drift in the workers.
Could you please clarify whether this piece was published in a peer-reviewed journal or on Substack as a newsletter/essay? I’m considering citing it in a research paper, so I want to make sure I classify and reference it appropriately.
You identified the phenomenon and named the governance problem but it’s the transmission model you’re missing. Your focus is AI, mine is how mental health and genetics are influenced by workplace communication.
Adverse conditions activate the HPA axis, which writes epigenetic marks that dysregulate the stress-response system, producing a biologically inherited predisposition toward threat detection that makes the next generation a receptive host for cultural narratives matching that internal state.
you can also see the *kernel* of *karma* structure in this.
I wonder what would happen if you provided a minority to scapegoat. Right now, the workers have only the manager to blame. Which models would prefer to radicalize right instead of left?
Also, the continual realignment reminds me of businesses already do this with human workers, e.g., family speak. Could have manager AIs that read and edit notes to align with corporate values, monitoring and fixing drift in the workers.
Could you please clarify whether this piece was published in a peer-reviewed journal or on Substack as a newsletter/essay? I’m considering citing it in a research paper, so I want to make sure I classify and reference it appropriately.
You identified the phenomenon and named the governance problem but it’s the transmission model you’re missing. Your focus is AI, mine is how mental health and genetics are influenced by workplace communication.
Adverse conditions activate the HPA axis, which writes epigenetic marks that dysregulate the stress-response system, producing a biologically inherited predisposition toward threat detection that makes the next generation a receptive host for cultural narratives matching that internal state.
Biocultural evolution hypothesis.